Multi-modality imaging in planning patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas : myths and reality
(2005)
Files
Daisne-thesis_2005.pdf
Open Access - Adobe PDF
- 3.33 MB
Details
- Authors
- Supervisors
- Grégoire, Vincent
- Abstract
- (en) Radiation oncology was these 20 last years revolutionized by the 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and its technical evolution, the intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Thanks to steep dose gradient dose distribution, these techniques allow to conform the prescribed dose to the Planning Target Volume (PTV) while significantly decreasing the dose delivered to the Organs at Risk (OAR). One critical step remains the accurate definition of the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV). If the GTV is underestimated, there is a risk of missing part of the target. If the GTV is overestimated, the risk is to overirradiate normal tissues. Today's gold standard for GTV definition is the Computed Tomography (CT) scanner. We though know that its poor soft tissues contrast is a factor of variability for target definition purpose. AIMS : It can be hypothesized that, for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas located in the oropharynx or the laryngo-hypopharynx, the use of other anatomical (like Magnetic Resonance Imaging - MRI) or functional (like positron emission tomography with either 11C-methionine - MET-PET- or 18F-fluorol-deoxy-glucose - FDG-PET) imaging modalities could complement CT for GTV delineation, and have an impact on subsequent CTV and PTV delineation and dose distribution to the non target tissues outside the PTV. RESULTS : We could demonstrate that, providing an adequate and controlled methodology concerning image coregistration and tumor volume delineation on functional images, differences were observed for the delineation of primary tumor volume or GTV according to the modality used. Moreover, the trends were the same for both locations studied (oropharyngeal and laryngo-hypopharyngeal) : CT, MRI and MET-PET volumes were not significantly different in absolute volumes, but there was no total overlap, each imaging modality having the tendency to visualize different types and relatively specific pathways of tumor extension (e.g. : cartilages in MRI). What was very interesting was the significantly smaller FDG-PET volume which could have a real impact on radiation oncology practice by (1) allowing to reduce dose distribution and (2) providing fast and reproducible GTV delineation based on its functional characteristic. Furthermore, we could demonstrate on the subset of operated patients that these smaller FDG-PET volumes were not the fact of a volume underestimating delineation algorithm but well the reflection of true tumor extension. But one must keep in mind that because of spatial resolution limitations, there was still a significant overestimate of this true GTV. Also, none of the imaging modalities was able to visualize very small tumor extensions. This last fact put in the light the need for strict guidelines for CTV prediction based on GTV extension. This is what was done with the help of both anatomical and histo-pathological literature data. These guidelines were used to delineate CTVs on our images, allowing to perform comparative planning on primary tumor. It could be concluded that differences in GTV had not only an impact on CTV and subsequent PTV, but also on dose distribution, either on total irradiated volume or -perhaps more important- on mean dose to parotid glands. No significant effect could be observed on maximal dose to spinal cord. Compared to planning performed on macroscopy-based volumes, no significant difference could be found with what was done on PET-derived planning. CONCLUSION : This research paves the way for the use of FDG-PET for GTV delineation in planning the patients with oropharyngeal and laryngo-hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas.
- Affiliations
Citations
Daisne, J.-F. (2005). Multi-modality imaging in planning patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas : myths and reality. https://hdl.handle.net/2078.5/129695