Kashima (2016) underlines the importance of considering religion as one of the major contemporary cultural sources of intergroup conflict around the world. In this commentary, I first examine theory and psychological research either discharging or charging religion per se, including fundamentalism, as being a cultural cause of intergroup conflict and violence. The evidence is in favor of the latter. Second, I propose a model of cultural psychological diversity of religious fundamentalism, across monotheistic religions and denominations. I finally argue, following Kashima’s (2016) global perspective on the person-culture-nature interactions, that cultural differences on religious fundamentalism may be understood as reflecting long-time interactions between natural and cultural environments and human animals, which, by creating religious (sub)cultures, rebuild, even if frequently with negative consequences, their ecological niches.
Saroglou, V. (2016). Intergroup conflict, religious fundamentalism, and culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115621174 (Original work published 2016)