Social Capital and Trust in the Design and Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action: Case Studies on IP Coordinating Mechanisms in Plant Genetic Resources and the Biomedical Sector

Six, Benjamin;van Zimmeren, Esther;Frison, Christine;Popa, Florin
(2012) Second Thematic Conference of the IASC “Design and Dynamics of Institutions for Collective Action: A Tribute to Prof. Elinor Ostrom” — Location: Utrecht University, the Netherlands (29.November.2012)

Files

No attached file found for this publication.

Details

Authors
  • Six, BenjaminUCLouvain
    Author
  • van Zimmeren, EstherKU Leuven
    Author
  • Frison, ChristineUCLouvain
    Author
  • Popa, FlorinUCLouvain
    Author
Abstract
This paper aims at developing an original account of trust in the framework of large scale, international collective action institutions. Our research question focuses on the structures and mechanisms that are necessary to sustain the trust needed to uphold the effective operation of institutions for collective action. Our theoretical framework for studying trust is based on the social capital theory. Social capital is defined as the features of social organization, such as trust, networks and norms that facilitate coordination and cooperation for mutual benefit. We claim that in different sectors and contexts stakeholders encounter difficulties in collaborating in setting up experimental institutions for collective action. In order to generate more collaboration, stakeholders need to create structures that incite actors to find better ways to sustain trust, to integrate the process of sustaining trust in the organization, and to nourish it with the precise normative idea behind the institutional apparatus. In the plant and biomedical sector, stakeholders have encountered difficulties in sustaining trust while experimenting with different coordination mechanisms for dealing with the increased appropriation of knowledge through patents. Our analysis of some examples from the plant and biomedical sector suggest that institutions could be understood as complex pragmatic connectors of trust, i.e. social matrices of collective action that sustain individual commitment, where routine and reflexivity drive trust-based coordination mechanisms in interaction with their environment.
Affiliations

Citations

  • APA
  • Chicago
  • FWB

Six, B., van Zimmeren, E., Frison, C., & Popa, F. (2012). Social Capital and Trust in the Design and Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action: Case Studies on IP Coordinating Mechanisms in Plant Genetic Resources and the Biomedical Sector. Second Thematic Conference of the IASC “Design and Dynamics of Institutions for Collective Action: A Tribute to Prof. Elinor Ostrom”, Utrecht University, the Netherlands. https://hdl.handle.net/2078.5/72816