In this paper, I criticize Putnam's argument, which contends that scientific realism implies adherence to a God's eye point of view. I also show that some sort of God's eye point of view in a weak sense, i.e., interest-free, is indeed accessible to humans and that a moderate version of scientific realism is philosophically defensible.
Ghins, M. (2005). Putnam and the God’s Eye Point of View. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 5(14), 235-244. https://hdl.handle.net/2078.5/152033 (Original work published 2005)