The impact of the unilateral EU commitment on the stability of international climate agreements

Bréchet, Thierry;Eyckmans, J.;Gerard, Fr.;Marbaix, Philippe;van Ypersele de Strihou, Jean-Pascal;et.al.
(2010) Climate Policy — Vol. 10, n° 2, p. 148-166 (2010)

Files

No attached file found for this publication.

Details

Authors
  • Bréchet, ThierryUCLouvain
    Author
  • Eyckmans, J.
    Author
  • Gerard, Fr.
    Author
  • Author
  • Tulkens, HenryUCLouvain
    Author
  • van Ypersele de Strihou, Jean-Pascalorcid-logoUCLouvain
    Author
Show more
Abstract
The negotiation strategy of the European Union was analysed with respect to the formation of an international climate agreement of the post-2012 area. Game theory was employed to explore the incentives for key players in the climate policy arena to join future climate agreements. A - 20% unilateral commitment strategy by the EU was compared with a multilateral - 30% emission reduction strategy for all Annex-B countries. Using a numerical integrated assessment climate-economy simulation model, we fond that leakage, in the sense of strategic policy reactions on emissions, was negligible. The EU strategy to reduce emissions by 30% (compared with 1990 levels) by 2020, if other Annex-B countries follow suit, does not induce the participation of the USA with a comparable reduction commitment. However, we argue that the original EU proposal can be reshaped so as to stabilize a larger and more ambitious climate coalition than the Kyoto Protocol in its first commitment period.
Affiliations

Citations

Bréchet, T., Eyckmans, J., Gerard, Fr., Marbaix, P., Tulkens, H., & van Ypersele de Strihou, J.-P. (2010). The impact of the unilateral EU commitment on the stability of international climate agreements. Climate Policy, 10(2), 148-166. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2009.0643 (Original work published 2010)