Testing the proportional odds assumption in multiply imputed ordinal longitudinal data

Donneau, Anne-Françoise;Mauer, Murielle E L;Lambert, Philippe;Lesaffre, Emmanuel M E H;Albert, Aurélie
(2015) Journal of Applied Statistics — Vol. 42, n° 10, p. 2257-2279 (2015)

Files

ISBARP_2015_31_lambert_Testingtheproportionaloddsassumption.pdf
  • Restricted Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 864.37 KB

Details

Authors
  • Donneau, Anne-FrançoiseOther
    Author
  • Mauer, Murielle E LAutre
    Author
  • Author
  • Lesaffre, Emmanuel M E HKUL
    Author
  • Albert, AurélieUliège
    Author
Abstract
A popular choice when analyzing ordinal data is to consider the cumulative proportional odds model to relate the marginal probabilities of the ordinal outcome to a set of covariates. However, application of this model relies on the condition of identical cumulative odds ratios across the cut-offs of the ordinal outcome; the well-known proportional odds assumption. This paper focuses on the assessment of this assumption while accounting for repeated and missing data. In this respect, we develop a statistical method built on multiple imputation (MI) based on generalized estimating equations that allows to test the proportionality assumption under the missing at random setting. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated for two MI algorithms for incomplete longitudinal ordinal data. The impact of both MI methods is compared with respect to the type I error rate and the power for situations covering various numbers of categories of the ordinal outcome, sample sizes, rates of missingness, well-balanced and skewed data. The comparison of both MI methods with the complete-case analysis is also provided.We illustrate the use of the proposed methods on a quality of life data from a cancer clinical trial.
Affiliations

Citations

Donneau, A.-F., Mauer, M. E. L., Lambert, P., Lesaffre, E. M. E. H., & Albert, A. (2015). Testing the proportional odds assumption in multiply imputed ordinal longitudinal data. Journal of Applied Statistics, 42(10), 2257-2279. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2015.1023704 (Original work published 2015)