Users’ and Health Professionals’ Values in Relation to a Psychiatric Intervention: The Case of Psychiatric Advance Directives

Nicaise, Pablo;Soto Rojas, Victoria;Dubois, Vincent;Lorant, Vincent
(2015) Administration and Policy in Mental Health — Vol. 42, n° 4, p. 384-393 (2015)

Files

2014-nicaise_soto_dubois_lorant-PAD_stakeholder_values-AdmPolMH.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 293.02 KB
Download

Details

Authors
Abstract
Although clinical and organisational benefits have been expected from Psychiatric Advance Directives (PADs), their take-up rates remain low and their evaluation disappointing. The endorsement of PADs by stakeholders is decisive for their use and understanding stakeholders’ preferences for implementation is crucial. A Multinomial Discrete Choice analysis was carried out of options for designing, completing, and honouring PADs, with a view to enhancing user autonomy, therapeutic alliance, care coordination, and feasibility. Although autonomy underlies the whole process, the criteria determining options varied with the stage of the intervention. These criteria should be taken into account in future PAD intervention and evaluation processes.
Affiliations

Citations

  • APA
  • Chicago
  • FWB

Nicaise, P., Soto Rojas, V., Dubois, V., & Lorant, V. (2015). Users’ and Health Professionals’ Values in Relation to a Psychiatric Intervention: The Case of Psychiatric Advance Directives. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(4), 384-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-014-0580-2 (Original work published 2015)