(2022) ELI Digital Law SIG Speaker Series — Location: Online (9.November.2022)
Files
No attached file found for this publication.
Details
Authors
Mocanu, DianaUCLouvain
Author
Abstract
In the European Commission’s proposal for an AI Act, as well as in the new AI liability framework, AI systems are treated as products, or things, albeit riskier than the average gadget, so as to warrant either an additional layer of fundamental rights protections, such as in the AI Act, or an attempt to make it easier for consumers to claim compensation in case of damages, such as in the draft directive for defective products and the draft AI liability directive. These developments are prone to various critiques however, not least regarding the legal status of such uncanny entities that straddle the border between thing and person as AI systems seem to be. The question that arises when confronted with such doubts, it was argued, is if their legal status would not be better conceptualized by a different legal category altogether. The webinar went on to explore the possibility of granting (some form of) legal personhood to AI systems, as well as a third option, of creating a sui generis legal status specifically tailored to AI systems, with the aim of better reflecting their role in society and thus ensuring the coherence of the legal theoretical assumptions underlying and holding together European legal systems.