First depressed, then discriminated against?

Baert, Stijn;De Visschere, Sarah;Schoors, Koen;Vandenberghe, Désirée;Omey, Eddy
(2016) Social Science & Medicine — Vol. 170, p. 247-254 (2016)

Files

2016_Baert_Soc_Sci_Med.pdf
  • Restricted Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 331.98 KB

Details

Authors
  • Baert, StijnUCLouvain
    Author
  • De Visschere, Sarah
    Author
  • Schoors, Koen
    Author
  • Vandenberghe, Désirée
    Author
  • Omey, Eddy
    Author
Abstract
Each year a substantial share of the European population suffers from major depression. This mental illness may affect individuals' later life outcomes indirectly by the stigma it inflicts. The present study assesses hiring discrimination based on disclosed depression. To this end, between May 2015 and July 2015, we sent out 288 trios of job applications from fictitious candidates to real vacancies in Belgium. Within each trio, one candidate claimed to have become unemployed only recently, whereas the other two candidates revealed former depression or no reason at all for their unemployment during a full year. Disclosing a year of inactivity due to former depression decreases the probability of getting a job interview invitation by about 34% when compared with candidates who just became unemployed, but the stigma effect of a year of depression is not significantly higher than the stigma effect of a year of unexplained unemployment. In addition, we found that these stigmas of depression and unemployment were driven by our male trios of fictitious candidates. As a consequence, our results are in favour of further research on gender heterogeneity in the stigma of depression and other health impairments.
Affiliations

Citations

Baert, S., De Visschere, S., Schoors, K., Vandenberghe, D., & Omey, E. (2016). First depressed, then discriminated against? Social Science & Medicine, 170, 247-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.033 (Original work published 2016)