Common mistakes about numerical representations.

Pesenti, Mauro;Andres, Michael
(2009) Behavioral and Brain Sciences : an international journal of current research and theory with open peer commentary — Vol. 32, n° 3-4 p. 346-7; discussion 356-73 (2009)

Files

document.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 1.15 MB
Download

Details

Authors
Abstract
Cohen Kadosh & Walsh (CK&W) argue that recent findings challenge the hypothesis of abstract numerical representations. Here we show that because, like many other authors in the field, they rely on inaccurate definitions of abstract and non-abstract representations, CK&W fail to provide compelling evidence against the abstract view.
Affiliations

Citations

  • APA
  • Chicago
  • FWB

Pesenti, M., & Andres, M. (2009). Common mistakes about numerical representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences : an international journal of current research and theory with open peer commentary, 32(3-4 p. 346-7; discussion 356-73). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09990835 (Original work published 2009)