One often alleges that laboratory bond-strength testing cannot predict clinical effectiveness of adhesives. Major argument to sustain this claim is the wide variation in bond-strength values recorded for one specific adhesive among different research institutes worldwide. The main reason for these inconsistent bond-strength measurements is supposedly the current lack of a standard bond-strength testing protocol. This paper ( and presentation) aimed to report on an extensive literature review with regard to the different laboratory bond-strength test methods and their data provided, along with a second extensive literature review on clinical effectiveness data of adhesives in terms of retention rates of adhesive Class-V restorations. Combining both systematic reviews, we have subsequently searched for a potential relationship between bond-strength data and clinical outcomes. (C) 2009 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Van Meerbeek, B., Peumans, M., Poitevin, A., Mine, A., Van Ende, A., & Neves, A. (2010). Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dental Materials, 26(2), E100-E121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148 (Original work published 2010)