Muller, ChristopheUniversité de la Méditerranée, Marseille
Author
Schokkaert, ErikUCLouvain
Author
Abstract
We argue that the economic evaluation of health care (cost-benefit analysis) should respect individual preferences and should incorporate distributional considerations. Relying on individual preferences does not imply subjective welfarism. We propose a particular non-welfarist approach, based on the concept of equivalent income, and show how it helps to define distributional weights. We illustrate the feasibility of our approach with empirical results from a pilot survey.
Fleurbaey, M., Luchini, S., Muller, C., & Schokkaert, E. (2013). Equivalent income and fair evaluation of health care. Health Economics, 22(6), 711-729. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.2859 (Original work published 2013)