Jureta, Ivan;Faulkner, Stéphane;Schobbens, Pierre Yves
(2006) 14th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering
Files
No attached file found for this publication.
Details
Authors
Jureta, IvanUnamur
Author
Faulkner, StéphaneUnamur
Author
Schobbens, Pierre YvesUCLouvain
Author
Abstract
Representation and reasoning about information system (IS) requirements is facilitated with the use of goal models to describe the desired and undesired IS behaviors. One difficulty in building and using goal models is in knowing why a model instance is as it is at some point of the requirements engineering (RE) process. If justifications for modeling choices are missing, an instance of a goal model can neither be considered appropriate nor inappropriate in a given RE project. This paper suggests a goal argumentation method (GAM) for recording the decision-making process which results in modeling choices. GAM combines a design rationale approach that guides common-sense reasoning about the goal model with an argumentation model which records and allows analysis of the justification processes leading to modeling decisions
Affiliations
Louvain School of ManagementOperations and Information
Citations
APA
Chicago
FWB
Jureta, I., Faulkner, S., & Schobbens, P. Y. (2006). Justifying Goal Models. 14th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering. https://hdl.handle.net/2078.5/250400