Case note on CJEU's RNNS and KA (C-225/19 and C-226/19): No objection without substantiation? The visa applicant's right to an effective remedy in the case of consultation procedures

Frasca, Eleonora
(2020) Cahiers de l’EDEM — Vol. décembre 2020, p. 1-7 (2020)

Files

2012CahierDecember2020-KNNSandRA.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 412.7 KB
Download

Details

Authors
Abstract
With the ruling RNNS and KA (C-225/19 and C-226/19), the CJEU deals with the prior consultation procedure in the context of visa application whereby a Member State can object to the issuing of a Schengen visa by another Member States. On the one hand, the Court strengthens the procedural safeguards surrounding the decision of refusal, by clarifying (and expanding) the scope of the duty to state reasons for the decision of refusal. On the other hand, it complexifies the scope of the right to an effective remedy (and of appeal procedures) by judging that the domestic Court that adopted the final decision on the visa cannot review the merits of the objection of the other Member State.
Affiliations

Citations

  • APA
  • Chicago
  • FWB

Frasca, E. (2020). Case note on CJEU’s RNNS and KA (C-225/19 and C-226/19): No objection without substantiation? The visa applicant’s right to an effective remedy in the case of consultation procedures. Cahiers de l’EDEM, décembre 2020, 1-7. https://hdl.handle.net/2078.5/113956 (Original work published 2020)