We argue that the economic evaluation of health care (cost-benefit analysis) should respect individual preferences and should incorporate distributional consid- erations. Relying on individual preferences does not imply subjective welfarism. We propose a particular non-welfarist approach, based on the concept of equivalent income, and show how it helps to define distributional weights. We illustrate the feasibility of our approach with empirical results from a pilot survey.
Fleurbaey, M., Luchini, S., Muller, C., & Schokkaert, E. (2010). Equivalent income and the economic evaluation of health core (CORE Discussion Paper 2010/6). https://hdl.handle.net/2078.5/249760