How relevant is the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to nursing care?
(2012) International Journal of Nursing Practice — Vol. 18, n° 6, p. 519-526 (2012)
Files
pdfdocument.pdf
Restricted Access - Adobe PDF
- 594.71 KB
Details
- Authors
- Abstract
- Barriers obstructing evidence-based nursing have been explored in many countries. Lack of resources and evidence has been noted as one of these barriers. We aimed to identify nursing care-related systematic reviews published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from 1996 until 2009. Using a broad search strategy we identified titles of Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols that focused on nursing care. The abstract of each title was examined and predetermined data were collected and analysed. 1249 titles out of a possible 6244 records were identified as being relevant to nursing care. Most of them focused on newborn and adult populations and related to comparing one intervention with another, and management strategies. The most common nursing specialties represented were internal medicine (34%) and mother and child care (25%). Twenty one percent of reviews published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews are of direct interest to those involved in nursing care however their relevance was not always obvious. © 2012 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
- Affiliations
Citations
Geurden, B. J. G., Stern, C., Piron, C., & Gobert, M. (2012). How relevant is the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to nursing care? International Journal of Nursing Practice, 18(6), 519-526. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12012 (Original work published 2012)