Who wins and who loses? Public transfer accounts for US generations born 1850 to 2090

Bommier, Antoine;Lee, Ronald;Miller, Tim;Zuber, Stéphane
(2010) Population and Development Review — Vol. 36, n° 1, p. 1-26 (2010)

Files

pdfdocument.pdf
  • Restricted Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 894.52 KB

Details

Authors
  • Bommier, AntoineToulouse School of Economics (CNRS, GREMAQ), France
    Author
  • Lee, RonaldDemography and Jordan Family Professor of Economics, University of California, Berkeley
    Author
  • Miller, TimUnited Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (CELADE, ECLAC), Santiago, Chile
    Author
  • Zuber, StéphaneUCLouvain
    Author
Abstract
Public transfer programs in industrial countries are thought to benefit the elderly through pension and health care programs at the expense of the young and future generations. This intergenerational picture changes, however, if public education is also considered as a transfer program. We calculate the net present value at birth of benefits received minus taxes paid for US generations born 1850 to 2090. Surprisingly, all generations 1950 to 2050 are net gainers, while many current elderly are net losers. Windfall gains from starting Social Security and Medicare partially offset windfall losses from starting public education, roughly consistent with the arguments of Becker and Murphy. © 2010 The Population Council, Inc.
Affiliations

Citations

Bommier, A., Lee, R., Miller, T., & Zuber, S. (2010). Who wins and who loses? Public transfer accounts for US generations born 1850 to 2090. Population and Development Review, 36(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00315.x (Original work published 2010)