Multicenter analytical evaluation of the automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for cyclosporine

Vogeser, Michael;Shipkova, Maria;Rigo-Bonnin, Raül;Wallemacq, Pierre;Verstraete, Alain G.;et.al.
(2014) Therapeutic Drug Monitoring — Vol. 36, n° 5, p. 640-650 (2014)

Files

2014_Vogeser_Ther_Drug_Monit.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 611.14 KB

Details

Authors
  • Vogeser, Michael
    Author
  • Shipkova, Maria
    Author
  • Rigo-Bonnin, Raül
    Author
  • Wallemacq, PierreUCLouvain
    Author
  • Verstraete, Alain G.
    Author
Show more
Abstract
BACKGROUND:: Cyclosporine A (CsA) is used as a posttransplantation immunosuppressant drug, and careful monitoring of CsA concentration in whole blood is essential. A new automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) for CsA measurement has been assessed in a multicenter evaluation. METHODS:: Residual EDTA whole blood samples from patients undergoing CsA therapy after organ transplant were used in assay evaluation at 5 clinical laboratories in Europe. Experiments included imprecision according to CLSI EP5-A2 (within-run and intermediate), lower limit of quantification, linearity according to CLSI EP6-A, and recovery of commercial external quality control samples. In addition, comparisons to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods in routine use at each investigational site and to commercial chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay and antibody-conjugated magnetic immunoassay methods were performed. RESULTS:: Imprecision testing gave coefficients of variation of less than 9% in the 30-2000 mcg/L range for both within-run and intermediate imprecision. Lower limit of quantification of 6.8 mcg/L at one investigational site and 1.8 mcg/L at a second site at 20% coefficient of variation were observed. Linearity was measured over the concentration range 0-2000 mcg/L, yielding a deviation of less than ±12%. External quality control sample recovery by ECLIA was 93%-114% of LC-MS/MS sample recovery. Deming regression analysis of ECLIA method comparison to combined LC-MS/MS results yielded a slope of 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-1.06] and intercept of 2.8 mcg/L (95% CI, 1.5-4.1 mcg/L). Comparison to chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay yielded a slope of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.85-0.89) and intercept of 1.4 mcg/L (95% CI, -0.89 to 3.7 mcg/L); comparison to antibody-conjugated magnetic immunoassay yielded a slope of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.98) and intercept of -4.2 mcg/L (95% CI, -7.1 to -1.2 mcg/L). CONCLUSIONS:: The data from this multicenter evaluation indicate that the new ECLIA-based cyclosporine assay is fit for its purpose, the therapeutic monitoring of CsA.
Affiliations

Citations

Vogeser, M., Shipkova, M., Rigo-Bonnin, R., Wallemacq, P., Orth, M., Widmann, M., & Verstraete, A. G. (2014). Multicenter analytical evaluation of the automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for cyclosporine. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, 36(5), 640-650. https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000000068 (Original work published 2014)