Validation of cone beam computed tomography-based tooth printing using different three-dimensional printing technologies.
(2016) Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology — Vol. 121, n° 3, p. 307-315 (2016)
Files
Khalil-2016-Validationofconebeamcomputed.pdf
Restricted Access - Adobe PDF
- 1.25 MB
Details
- Authors
- Abstract
- (en) OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the accuracy of 3-dimensional reconstructed models of teeth compared with the natural teeth by using 4 different 3-dimensional printers. STUDY DESIGN: This in vitro study was carried out using 2 intact, dry adult human mandibles, which were scanned with cone beam computed tomography. Premolars were selected for this study. Dimensional differences between natural teeth and the printed models were evaluated directly by using volumetric differences and indirectly through optical scanning. Analysis of variance, Pearson correlation, and Bland Altman plots were applied for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Volumetric measurements from natural teeth and fabricated models, either by the direct method (the Archimedes principle) or by the indirect method (optical scanning), showed no statistical differences. The mean volume difference ranged between 3.1 mm(3) (0.7%) and 4.4 mm(3) (1.9%) for the direct measurement, and between -1.3 mm(3) (-0.6%) and 11.9 mm(3) (+5.9%) for the optical scan. A surface part comparison analysis showed that 90% of the values revealed a distance deviation within the interval 0 to 0.25 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Current results showed a high accuracy of all printed models of teeth compared with natural teeth. This outcome opens perspectives for clinical use of cost-effective 3-dimensional printed teeth for surgical procedures, such as tooth autotransplantation
- Affiliations
Citations
Khalil, W., EzEldeen, M., Van De Casteele, E., Shaheen, E., Sun, Y., Shahbazian, M., Olszewski, R., Politis, C., & Jacobs, R. (2016). Validation of cone beam computed tomography-based tooth printing using different three-dimensional printing technologies. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 121(3), 307-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.10.028 (Original work published 2016)