The Condemned Door: The Non-Sublime Side of the Kantian Sublime or the Intractable Excess of the Sensible World

(2025) Studia Philosophica Kantiana — Vol. 14, n° 1, p. 74-93 (2025)

Files

TheCondemneddoorLunaMalaga.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 224.87 KB

Details

Authors
Abstract
Properly speaking, the sublime “cannot be contained in any sensible form, but concerns only ideas of reason”. Moreover, for the sublime to take place—Kant affirms—we must abandon sensibility. To some extent, the sublime is a negation of the sensible world. Therefore, in contrast to Kant’s approach, I will focus instead on the non-sublime aspect of the sublime, i.e., that sensible element that plays a critical role in the experience but is not considered worthy of the label “sublime”. After all, it is the Analytic of the Sublime that highlights what it tries to overshadow: the intractable excess of the sensible realm and imagination’s non-subservience to the mandates of reason. Unlike the properly sublime, art is not intended to serve a shielding function (the sublime comfort us by reassuring us of the purposiveness of our moral vocation); rather, like the non-sublime, it promotes the disruption of what is well formed.
Affiliations

Citations

Luna Málaga, N. (2025). The Condemned Door: The Non-Sublime Side of the Kantian Sublime or the Intractable Excess of the Sensible World. Studia Philosophica Kantiana, 14(1), 74-93. https://hdl.handle.net/2078.5/260957 (Original work published 2025)